1/2 NEW SHEQEL (1992)
April 3rd, 2010 | 
Author: 
1/2 NEW SHEQEL
6.5200 g., Aluminum-Bronze, 25.95 mm. Obv: Value Rev: Lyre Edge: Plain
| Date | Mintage | F | VF | XF | Unc | BU |
| JE5752-1992 | 2,688,000 | - | - | 0.35 | 0.75 | - |
Related posts:
- A COUNTRIES (80)
- B COUNTRIES (101)
- C COUNTRIES (93)
- D COUNTRIES (28)
- E COUNTRIES (54)
- F COUNTRIES (49)
- G COUNTRIES (168)
- H COUNTRIES (28)
- ▼I COUNTRIES (123)
- ICELAND (19)
- INDIA-BRITISH (4)
- INDIA-PRINCELY STATES (3)
- INDIA-REPUBLIC (5)
- INDONESIA (6)
- IRAN (2)
- IRAQ (2)
- IRELAND (23)
- ISLE OF MAN (6)
- ▼ISRAEL (24)
- 1/2 LIRA (1975)
- 1/2 NEW SHEQEL (1992)
- 1/2 SHEQEL (1980)
- 10 AGOROT (1962)
- 10 AGOROT (1978)
- 10 AGOROT (1988)
- 10 NEW AGOROT (1980)
- 10 SHEQALIM (1982)
- 100 SHEQALIM (1984)
- 25 AGOROT (1978)
- 5 AGOROT (1971)
- 5 AGOROT (1979)
- 5 AGOROT (1995)
- 5 LIROT (1978)
- 5 NEW AGOROT (1980)
- 5 SHEQALIM (1982)
- 50 PRUTA (1954)
- 50 SHEQALIM (1984)
- AGORA (1972)
- AGORA (1986)
- ISRAEL
- LIRA (1978)
- NEW AGORA (1980)
- SHEQEL (1981)
- ITALY (29)
- J COUNTRIES (24)
- K COUNTRIES (53)
- L COUNTRIES (69)
- M COUNTRIES (66)
- N COUNTRIES (72)
- O COUNTRIES (2)
- P COUNTRIES (84)
- Q COUNTRIES (2)
- R COUNTRIES (99)
- S COUNTRIES (181)
- T COUNTRIES (89)
- U COUNTRIES (71)
- V COUNTRIES (25)
- W COUNTRIES (2)
- Y COUNTRIES (27)
- Z COUNTRIES (5)
Posted in 
Tags: 
2 BAHT 5 CENTS 10 CENTS 10 ROUBLES 1950 1965 1966 1967 1971 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 CENT ROUBLE
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
This website has got a lot of very useful information on it. Thank you for informing me!
Interesting , how would I use this?
An interesting post there mate ! Thank you for that .
The weblog really is very good. I like looking through it regardless, the writing seems somewhat weird while using opera world wide web broswer
All I could say is wow. I’ve certainly not checked out it like this, but I appreicate you posting it. I will carry on to be an everyday reader of one’s blog.
thanks for this insight. I would have been surprised if this weren?t your position. But the manner in which you described it was to the say the least, ambiguous.